Friday, September 18, 2009
In the 80's and 90's Christians were notoriously lagging in cultural awareness, let alone leading cultural revolutions. Christian movies were poorly made, our fashion seemed inspired by the days of the covered wagon, and our music was so lame even Jesus couldn't heal it. And while our humor obviously hasn't evolved much since then, our cultural 'coolness' I think has.
Christians seem to be making a cool comeback. We are getting hipper, trendier, and moving more and more toward the cutting edge of culture. We love iphones, google, and hip-hop. But why is this? I suppose it is in part a response to all that under-achievement from before. Our greatest fear is being corny our 'out of it'. But I also wonder if social networking isn't a good friend of the cool Christian.
The reality is that Christians know a lot of other Christians. And so when word on a new innovation, song, restaurant idea, website, application, or anything else comes out...because we have a lot of twitter and facebook friends, word spreads fast. So rather than falling behind culture as we did for so many years, we are finally catching up. And I wonder, is it possible that in another 10-15 years if we might not actually start to lead?
I don't know if it will happen. Perhaps we have been in a cultural sprint over the last 10 years and our endurance will fade fast. But I for one hope that our engagement with social networking will become a catalyst for a whole new generation of 'cool Christians' that move to the front edge of culture creation and become the icons of cool to many. If so I will attribute responsibility for this revolution to the following places and in this order:
4. The Evangelical Covenant Church
Friday, August 21, 2009
Over the past few months God has blessed our church with lots of new babies. Five couples, all good friends of ours, have had healthy and happy babies. This has been a wonderful source of joy and celebration for us. When Minhee and I went to Norway in June for vacation the thing I missed most was the babies, I couldn't wait to see them again.
And even more, Minhee and I were given the specific privilege to serve as godparents to two of them. Josephine Tao Go is the daughter of Rob and Nancy and pictured on the right in the pic. Noa Hunter Myung is the daughter of Roger and Phyllis and pictured on the left.
Recently I saw this pic on Rob's blog and stole it from him. While the girls look so cute I can also see a very similar pic being taken in about 80 years and it not looking that different. I look at it a lot. :)
Minhee and I aren't parents yet, hopefully soon. But if the kind of love I feel for these two girls and the other babies that have arrived is a hint of what that love will be like, I'm not sure my heart has space for it all. I may need a bigger heart.
Monday, April 20, 2009
Tomorrow is Earth Day and as Christians this is a day worth paying attention to. God's opening mission to man was to care for his creation, something we have performed quite poorly at. But I thought this article (forwarded to me from Meesa Kim) is an interesting way for Christians to care for creation. Certainly something I need to work at! :)
Save the Earth!
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
On March 21st at 2:50am Paul and Helen Kahn welcomed daughter Isabella into the world. Around 5am we got a text from Paul announcing the birth and unable to contain our excitement, Minhee and I were at the hospital by 6am. We got special permission to enter the maternity ward and met sweet Isabella as we watched the sunrise outside the window. It was perfect.
On April 5th BG and Hwasun Garin welcomed son Logan who came out looking like Esau and is sure to be an avid hunter and celebrated warrior. At the ripe old age of 24 hours he was already stocky in nature and will make his father proud for sure.
And then there was yesterday when Josephine Go arrived. Indulge me the story...
Last July a few married couples got together from church. This was the night that Paul and Helen announced they were pregnant. We all rejoiced with them but as we watched our good friends Rob and Nancy rejoice our hearts broke for them...because we knew how long they had been waiting to share the same news. As our hearts broke our prayers began to flow and 6 short weeks later their dream came true - Nancy was pregnant!
All was well until mid-October when an ultrasound revealed a potential abnormality. Soon after the worst possible scenario was realized - Rob and Nancy's baby was diagnosed with Trisomy-18, a terminal genetic disorder that meant, in the words of their doctor, "your baby is incompatible with life". The test was conclusive - 30 out of 30 cells tested 100% for the disease. Their doctors suggested termination.
This was tragic news. How could God give this great gift and then leave it no chance of life? Everyone was confused, scared and sad. This terrible news came on a Friday. That Sunday at church we all hugged and wept together. The sermon that Sunday was on "the glimmer of hope" found in Ruth and Naomi's seemingly helpless situation in Ruth 3. I don't know that anyone else found comfort in it...but I did.
After church that day we all gathered at Rob and Nancy's to hear from them and pray for them. As they shared our hearts broke more and more. We wanted to offer words of hope but had none. We wanted to pray for a miracle but weren't sure they could handle asking for it and setting themselves up for extreme disappointment again. But eventually they told us they would appreciate that prayer...a prayer for a miracle.
Just as we had when we prayed for conception, we sat them in the middle of the group and fell on our knees/faces and began to pray. There was crying, sniffling, drooling, heaving, and lots and lots of praying!! The situation seemed hopeless but the prayer seemed right. We left their house with nothing to do but wait.
The following Thursday Nancy visited her doctor who continued to suggest termination but the baby's heartbeat was strong and so they continued to wait. It would be the next day, Friday, where our miracle would become real.
While the lab had done an initial test on 30 cells where all came back showing Trisomy 18, there was also a chromosome test on 88 cells that took a week to get its results. That Friday, at 4:31pm, an e-mail came from Nancy with the following:
"Today, we received the final results of the test from last week, where they looked at 88 chromosomes that they grew for the past week and God gave us our miracle. All 88 cells were normal!?!? The geneticists are dumbfounded and "have never seen this before." (where it seemed so conclusive at the FISH analysis and the exact opposite during the next one)… They do not have an explanation, and are recommending an amnio since this was such a strange outcome...but forget it. We know who's hand is responsible. The final results say that our baby is normal. We could have a healthy baby! We are confused and elated and rejoicing! I've been crying in sorrow all week, that it is so refreshing to cry for joy!"
As the months since that great October day have passed Nancy's belly has grown and all of us here have looked more and more forward to seeing the fruit of our Father's labor. And yesterday, April 14th, at 3:10pm, a 5lb 15oz baby girl named Josephine Go was born into this world...perfectly healthy and happy.
Not everyone gets their miracle and I am so sad for those who do not...the pain is just too much. But I am grateful to God for this miracle in our corner of the world. And each time I look at Isabella, Logan, Josephine or the other babies that are still on their way I am going to remember 2009 and the miracles of life gifted to us.
Friday, March 27, 2009
Every other Thursday we have a "Senior Staff" meeting with Dave & Eugene of Highrock Arlington, Josh & Dan of Highrock Brookline, and Kiho of Highrock's Korean speaking church plant "Worship Frontier". Unfortunately, Eugene was sick yesterday and couldn't join us. This was most unfortunate for Dan b/c typically Dave and I have wild and crazy ideas that Dan and Eugene have to temper. So Dan called me yesterday before the meeting wondering if we should cancel. His reason?...b/c without Eugene to help Dan he was afraid that Dave and my ideas might run amuck. I assured him it would be fine and he headed toward the meeting (at my apartment).
In the meantime, Dave showed up a bit early and I joked with him about Dan's concern. As I was telling him we realized that we should pull a fast one on Dan...that perhaps we should plant a "crazy idea" in the middle of the meeting where I would agree with Dave and begin to freak Dan out. But what could we do? Dave and I began to plot...
After a minute Dave's diabolical mind found our answer. About 20 minutes into the meeting Dave would begin telling Dan and me about a new movement at Highrock Arlington in which people receive healing by the laying on of hands and how this has been most effective in the area of sexual healing. But the effectiveness has been born primarily out of the fact that the laying on of hands is VERY literally...the laying on of hands. Dave would tell us about women's and men's prayer meetings where the recipient of prayer undresses and allows those praying to "lay on hands" and ask God for healing. (for those not familiar with Highrock church - this is NOT something we do!!)
Furthermore, Dave would suggest that we at Highrock Brookline should consider trying this...and I would heartily agree. This kind of nonsense would hopefully send Dan into a frenzy begging us to reconsider and lamenting Eugene's absence at the meeting.
Soon after our plan was fortified Dan arrived and the meeting began....
Sure enough, about 20 minutes in Dave began to tell us about a new ministry at Highrock Arlington. He relayed that it began at a women's prayer meeting with Maye Chan inviting one of the women to "expose" herself and receive prayer and the laying on of hands. He went on to say that it had been so successful among the women that it had spread to the men's group as well and that great things were beginning to happen.
Now, my strategy in all of this was to join Dan in his shock at the opening of Dave's story but then to begin to warm to the idea until eventually I was convinced of the ideas merit. I would then try and persuade Dan that we should try it at Highrock Brookline. But the plan soon had to change as things did NOT go as expected.
As Dave was explaining this new "movement" I began my act of shock and awe at this rediculous revelation. I, of course, assumed Dan would join me in my shock at the absurdity of what Dave was proposing. But surprisingly, Dan seemed relatively unphased. As Dave was talking Dan was nodding, it was almost as if he had heard this story before. As Dave's story continued, growing more and more rediculous along the way, Dan began nodding all the more and began responding with statements like "Yeah, I understand.", "Yeah, I've seen stuff like this before.", and "Yeah, I had some experiences with this stuff when I was younger."
With each passing comment and nod the laughter was building inside of me. I felt it first deep in my stomach but could feel it rising through my chest, my neck until finally it erupted from within me. How was this possible? How could we create such a ludicrous story and find that it not only did not shock Dan but seemed legitimate to him. How could something so rediculous now become rational. My laughter grew until I was eventually keeled over in my hallway crying and laughing with Dan still at the table nodding.
In Dan's defense, I don't think he actually has any real experiences like this in the past but he was trying to be sensitive and supportive to Dave's experience. But the sequence of events left me chuckling all day long. It was a great laugh. So thanks to Dave for his creative mind and to Dan for his tender heart - they both fed my soul yesterday!
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Cnn.com posted an article today by Jeffrey Miron, a lecturer at Harvard. His thesis is that prohibition of drugs is a bad idea from almost all points of view: security, economics, health, etc. He suggests the legalization of all drugs, not just marijuana.
While I realize that there are probably some law enforcement officials out there that might take issue with this article I find these points of view fascinating and refreshing. I'm not at all convinced that he's right but appreciate his perspective and logic.
Read the story here or I've copied it below...
Jeffrey A. Miron is senior lecturer in economics at Harvard University.
Economist Jeffrey Miron says legalizing drugs would greatly reduce violence.
CAMBRIDGE, Massachusetts (CNN) -- Over the past two years, drug violence in Mexico has become a fixture of the daily news. Some of this violence pits drug cartels against one another; some involves confrontations between law enforcement and traffickers.
Recent estimates suggest thousands have lost their lives in this "war on drugs."
The U.S. and Mexican responses to this violence have been predictable: more troops and police, greater border controls and expanded enforcement of every kind. Escalation is the wrong response, however; drug prohibition is the cause of the violence.
Prohibition creates violence because it drives the drug market underground. This means buyers and sellers cannot resolve their disputes with lawsuits, arbitration or advertising, so they resort to violence instead.
Violence was common in the alcohol industry when it was banned during Prohibition, but not before or after.
Violence is the norm in illicit gambling markets but not in legal ones. Violence is routine when prostitution is banned but not when it's permitted. Violence results from policies that create black markets, not from the characteristics of the good or activity in question.
The only way to reduce violence, therefore, is to legalize drugs. Fortuitously, legalization is the right policy for a slew of other reasons.
Prohibition of drugs corrupts politicians and law enforcement by putting police, prosecutors, judges and politicians in the position to threaten the profits of an illicit trade. This is why bribery, threats and kidnapping are common for prohibited industries but rare otherwise. Mexico's recent history illustrates this dramatically.
Prohibition erodes protections against unreasonable search and seizure because neither party to a drug transaction has an incentive to report the activity to the police. Thus, enforcement requires intrusive tactics such as warrantless searches or undercover buys. The victimless nature of this so-called crime also encourages police to engage in racial profiling.
Prohibition has disastrous implications for national security. By eradicating coca plants in Colombia or poppy fields in Afghanistan, prohibition breeds resentment of the United States. By enriching those who produce and supply drugs, prohibition supports terrorists who sell protection services to drug traffickers.
Prohibition harms the public health. Patients suffering from cancer, glaucoma and other conditions cannot use marijuana under the laws of most states or the federal government despite abundant evidence of its efficacy. Terminally ill patients cannot always get adequate pain medication because doctors may fear prosecution by the Drug Enforcement Administration.
Drug users face restrictions on clean syringes that cause them to share contaminated needles, thereby spreading HIV, hepatitis and other blood-borne diseases.
Prohibitions breed disrespect for the law because despite draconian penalties and extensive enforcement, huge numbers of people still violate prohibition. This means those who break the law, and those who do not, learn that obeying laws is for suckers.
Prohibition is a drain on the public purse. Federal, state and local governments spend roughly $44 billion per year to enforce drug prohibition. These same governments forego roughly $33 billion per year in tax revenue they could collect from legalized drugs, assuming these were taxed at rates similar to those on alcohol and tobacco. Under prohibition, these revenues accrue to traffickers as increased profits.
The right policy, therefore, is to legalize drugs while using regulation and taxation to dampen irresponsible behavior related to drug use, such as driving under the influence. This makes more sense than prohibition because it avoids creation of a black market. This approach also allows those who believe they benefit from drug use to do so, as long as they do not harm others.
Legalization is desirable for all drugs, not just marijuana. The health risks of marijuana are lower than those of many other drugs, but that is not the crucial issue. Much of the traffic from Mexico or Colombia is for cocaine, heroin and other drugs, while marijuana production is increasingly domestic. Legalizing only marijuana would therefore fail to achieve many benefits of broader legalization.
It is impossible to reconcile respect for individual liberty with drug prohibition. The U.S. has been at the forefront of this puritanical policy for almost a century, with disastrous consequences at home and abroad.
The U.S. repealed Prohibition of alcohol at the height of the Great Depression, in part because of increasing violence and in part because of diminishing tax revenues. Similar concerns apply today, and Attorney General Eric Holder's recent announcement that the Drug Enforcement Administration will not raid medical marijuana distributors in California suggests an openness in the Obama administration to rethinking current practice.
Perhaps history will repeat itself, and the U.S. will abandon one of its most disastrous policy experiments.
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
At Highrock Brookline we are currently going through a sermon series on the Book of John and throughout the series we are asking the question "Who is Jesus?" Our goal is to enter into the experience of those 1st century men and women who were experiencing Jesus for the first time: hearing his teaching, seeing his miracles, and making their own decisions about his identity. And as we enter into their experience we are asking the same questions ourselves. Was he madman or Messiah, magician or miracle worker, lunatic or Lord?
However, I realize that one of the additional issues we face in the 21st century is not only asking the question "Is Jesus God?" but asking an even more fundamental question than that..."Is there a God at all?"
So, during my sermon this week, I mentioned three books that have been helpful to me as I have asked that question. Personally, my questions and doubts have rarely centered around Jesus and more often have centered around the question of God. And the three books pictured above have been formative in my own journey of faith.
"Mere Christianity" by C.S. Lewis is at the forefront of that formation. Lewis' own faith journey began as an attempt to provide an airtight case for atheism and ended with him on his knees "the most dejected and reluctant convert in all of England". Lewis' explanation of a universal moral law is the foundation of both his faith and the book and remains one of the great Christian apologetics.
"Total Truth" by Nancy Pearcey is a LONG book but a good one. Its basic premise is that Christianity (at least Western Christianity) is captive to culture rather than having captured culture. Pearcey does a nice deconstruction and lays out a case that if the Christian faith is truth then it is Total Truth and must not be relegated to a personal, privatized faith. Rather, it must infiltrate every part of our world.
"The Language of God" by Francis Collins is one of my favorites. Personally, my biggest doubts about faith have come around the issue of science and our origins and so Collins' book has been a wonderful gift to me. Collins was the lead scientist on the Human Genome Project and writes with a sense of intelligent awe that is inspiring to me as the reader.
If you are someone with genuine questions, not so much about Jesus, but about God, I would recommend any and all of these books. But start with Mere Christianity! :)